JazzGumPigmentPhotoStory1987-E-57 
Analog pigment printing with monochrome negative film ... ww Speaking of vintage prints in the 1980's ... It was only about Kodak's ≪Die Transfer Print≫. However, even this is dyed, so there is no weatherability ... Then, after making the original by die transfer, ... Digital, pigment jet printing, enlarged copy, etc. Rough work came out, expensive, seems to be trade ww #UAP in Spain 1995 Minolta Alpha Camera-Kodachrome film* The UFO was called #Flying Saucer, but this UAP is probably a #Flying Cup, no matter how you look at it. At the bottom of the object, a layer of atmosphere like a force field is formed. # UAP The actual color of the UAP shot on Kodachrome film is unknown. This is because older scanners do not analyze Kodachrome. #UAP announced by the US Department of Defense A 35mm reversal image taken more clearly and three-dimensionally? Is it metallic and has a hollow structure in the center? A streak pattern can be seen on the body of the object. https://youtu.be/y0i-PLDyMBQ Obtained a higher resolution image than the UAP image announced by the US Department of Defense. If you analyze it a little more, you can expect new information. 
+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ by the way・・ When the camera was still in the analog era Kodachrome film came out w I knew there was ... There was no film scanner. To be exact, There was no equipment that could color scan Kodachrome ww Recently ... At Amazon, a low-priced film scanner costs about 10,000 yen ... ww Even though it is a low-priced version, is it the same as the equipment for about 300,000 yen? Kodachrome is also properly color-corrected. In that Kodachrome, #UAP and #UFO But found ww When I shot it, I only thought about the moon in the daytime ... However, the color development is random ... Epson scan, when enlarged ... UFO is clear ... ww When I search on the net again ... I can't find the same type of UFO at all ww 
